News Archive 2018

MAY

Call for public consultation on church building plans

Just as revised plans for the Steeple Aston church’s “re-ordering” looked about to go ahead, a group of  senior church members unhappy about the proposals have written an open letter asking for “ a proper consultation process” to include at least one public meeting so that the views of all villagers can be heard.

In his monthly report to Steeple Aston Life, the Rector, Revd Marcus Green reported that following the intervention of the Diocesan Advisory Committee (DAC) revised proposals had been agreed. He was just awaiting final approval from the DAC before the formal process of applying for ‘faculty’ (the Church’s version of planning permission) could begin.

Revd Green described the revised proposals as follows: “We are no longer aiming to raise the nave floor, but will grade levels or provide ramps in order to have step-free access around the whole church. The wooden platforms the pews are built on will go, and new stone floors will be introduced, flush with the old stone floors around them. Heating will be provided by a mix of underfloor heating and radiators. The tower floor will be lowered, and two loos will be added in there, along with some chair storage. The vestry will be adapted, with space for children in a new Sunday school room, as well as upstairs storage and downstairs kitchen facilities and vestry space. Pews will be kept in the centre of the nave, but shortened and made moveable, and the north and south aisle will become more open. The font will be moved to the south aisle for better liturgical access and ease of use. The wooden screen at the nave arch will be kept and moved to the arch between the chancel and lady chapel. A moveable serving counter will be put in the lady chapel, and tables and chairs for hospitality will be available for use in the church. New doors will be placed on the South Porch, and the ringing chamber will be glazed in.”

Pictures and explanations of the new proposals are available in the Church.

However an open letter from four senior church members, David Armitage, Paul Beadman, Malcolm Hensher and Ian Jackson makes it clear that by no means all the members of congregation are supportive of the proposals.

They write: “The process has caused unhappiness in the congregation, with people who have supported the church for decades no longer comfortable worshipping there. Sensible suggestions like providing a kitchen unit and toilet have been rolled together with structural plans of unproven advantage, expensive to run and maintain, and with risks for the building as a whole.”

They say the building project has been in the hands of a small group and there has been little consultation with the wider population.

The letter says “It is not too late to apply common sense, in case decisions are taken that we one day regret. There must be a proper consultation process in which everyone in our villages can have sufficient say. Diversity of opinion, Christian and secular, should be respected. Due attention should be given to the importance of our mediaeval church, with its irreplaceable artefacts, as a part of our beautiful Oxfordshire landscape.”

They believe that as a minimum a public meeting with an independent chair should be held “to allow the issues to be debated comprehensively, openly, democratically” and ask villagers to support them.

To read the full text of their letter, please click here.


Villagers invited to meetings on Old Quarry and South Side proposals

Villagers are invited to two open meetings of the Parish Council’s Planning Committee to hear about proposals for development in the village.

On Tuesday, 29th May at 7.30pm in the Committee Room of the Village Hall, the subject will be the Old Quarry on Fenway. There is to be a presentation of initial proposals for the land, an old sandworks behind Old Quarry House which some have described as a nature conservation area. It was recently a subject of controversy when it was proposed for development, and was subsequently nominated as a Local Green Space in the Mid-Cherwell Development Plan and made the subject of a new area Tree Preservation Order (TPO) by Cherwell District Council.

Then on Thursday, 31st May at the same time in the same place, the developers Rectory Homes are to give a second presentation in advance of  re-submitting their planning application for the site on South Side opposite the entrance to Hill House.

The company withdrew an application for planning permission to build six houses on the site in February following a number of objections from local residents, the Parish Council, the Mid Cherwell Neighbourhood Plan Forum and the Highway Authority.

At a previous meeting, it was clear that neither the Parish Council nor other commentators were hostile to some development on this site. But there were major objections to the original scheme proposed.

Cherwell District Council’s recent Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) concluded that neither of these sites was suitable for development to provide housing for Oxford City Council.

These two meetings are open to members of the public. To see the formal notices for the meetings, please click here.


APRIL

Mid-Cherwell Neighbourhood Plan submitted at last

Martin Lipson, Steeple Aston Parish Councillor and Chairman of the MCNP Forum, writes: “After over three years of preparation, the Mid-Cherwell Neighbourhood Plan has finally been completed and formally submitted to Cherwell District Council. Before the end of March, CDC will launch the statutory consultation – during which anyone can submit comments on the proposed Plan. They will advertise this on their website and in various public locations, where copies of our documents will be available.

“The Plan will then go to Examination before a local Referendum is held in all eleven parishes involved in the Plan, of which Steeple and Middle Aston are just two. MCNP is believed to be by far the largest grouping of parishes that have prepared a neighbourhood plan in the country (and there are 2,200 of them in preparation, with 410 already approved).

“As many local people know, it is the development of Heyford Park that is the main reason why the parishes got together in the first place, keen to ensure that houses did not proliferate in the fields and villages around it, and keen also to ensure that adequate supporting facilities are provided for the new population, and that the effects of increased traffic are minimised.

“The Neighbourhood Plan therefore contains policies that, for example, support provision of a new cemetery for Heyford Park, require developers to submit proposals for reducing the impact of motorised traffic, and to take steps to replace any loss of biodoversity as a result of development.  The Plan also has a non-statutory section called the Community Action Plan, in which the parishes will continue to work together over the years ahead to bring to fruition a number of ambitious aims that are not just about land-use planning.

“At this stage we don’t know in which month of 2018 the Referendum will be held, but we do know on past experience that there are bound to be more delays. In May and June, we have been told, CDC planners will be occupied with the Public Enquiry into the somewhat unpopular proposals for thousands of new houses in the south of the District, to assist Oxford’s “unmet housing need”.  So we know that our Examination will not take place before that one is finished.

“Close discussions with CDC planners in the lead-up to our submission resulted in a few more changes to the version of the Plan on which MCNP consulted last summer. Steeple Aston’s settlement area – the built-up zone of the village in which development is preferred – has now had omitted the two areas at each end of the village that were previously shown on the village policy map. This is because CDC took the view that these potential sites would only be suitable as rural exception sites for low-cost housing, and as they were exceptions they should not be in the preferred zone.

“This does not diminish the Parish Council’s wish to see one or both of these sites eventually developed in a way that will benefit the village, but it does reduce the encouragement that might have otherwise been given to purely commercial developers. It is somewhat ironic that Rectory Homes recently put forward their scheme for one of the sites (opposite Hill House on South Side), only to have to withdraw it – as also reported on this website. If it is resubmitted without elements of affordable housing it will now have less support under the MCNP than it would have done. The other site – the former allotments on Heyford Road – remains perhaps a distant possibility.”


Election for district councillor only, after parish nominees unopposed

Six out of the seven people currently serving as parish councillors have been elected unopposed to continue in office after May 3rd.  To see the official election notice, please click here.

The Councillors continuing in office are Charlotte Bartlett, Charlotte Clarke, Stuart Ferguson, Martin Lipson, Richard Macandrew and Graham Porcas. The seventh current councillor Helen Wright decided not to stand for re-election this year. Once they have taken office these six new councillors will be able to co-opt a seventh if they so wish.

There will however be an election on  May 3rd for a Cherwell District Councillor as there have been four nominations for this single vacancy. Conservative councillor Mike Kerford-Byrnes is opposed by candidates from the Green Party, the Liberal Democrats and the Labour Party.

To see the official nomination document, please click here.

The election will take place in the Committee Room of the Village Hall on Thursday, 3rd May from 7.00am until 10.00pm.


Six candidates nominated to stand for Parish Council

Six out of the seven people currently serving as parish councillors have been nominated to continue in office after May 3rd. As there are seven vacancies there won’t need to be an election for the Parish Council this time around.

The six nominees are Charlotte Bartlett, Charlotte Clarke, Stuart Ferguson, Martin Lipson, Richard Macandrew and Graham Porcas. The seventh current councillor Helen Wright decided not to stand for re-election this year.

Once they have taken office these six new councillors will be able to co-opt a seventh if they so wish.

To see the official nomination document, please click here.

There will however be an election on  May 3rd for a Cherwell District Councillor as there have been four nominations for the single vacancy. Conservative councillor Mike Kerford-Byrnes is opposed by candidates from the Green Party, the Liberal Democrats and the Labour Party.

To see the official nomination document, please click here.


MARCH

Neighbourhood Watch revived following anti-social behaviour

A new Neighbourhood Watch scheme has been set up in response to the recent spate of crime and anti-social behaviour in the village. The new coordinator Martin Brimacombe recently met with Thames Valley Police and they agreed that reviving the scheme would be of benefit the community

There was an attempt to relaunch the old Neighbourhood Watch scheme three years ago, but there weren’t enough volunteers so it was decided to rely on the Thames Valley Alert scheme instead. Recent events though have meant that there has been an enthusiastic response to Martin’s call for street representatives.

Martin moved to the village in July 2014 after a short spell in Upper Heyford. He had spent the previous 24 years in the British Army, much of time stationed at Bicester.

He said: “Moving into the village has been a great experience and an introduction to a quiet rural community for my family. We have been made to feel very welcome by the members of the community out and about and at the Red Lion.

“However over the last six months it has been a little unsettling after becoming one of the victims of a number of the increased criminal activities and anti-social behaviour issues.

“Having expressed my concerns to Thames Valley Police about the increased activity and the thought that someone or property will be injured or damaged, I was asked take on the role and responsibility of becoming the new Neighbourhood Watch Coordinator for the village.”

The purpose of Steeple Aston Neighbourhood Watch is to promote good citizenship and greater public participation in the prevention and solution of crime so that effective liaison with the police and other partners can be achieved in order to promote reduced crime levels.

Martin says: “It’s a little shameful that our village is now the highest in the surrounding area for criminal activity. Let’s get as many people behind this and help make this a better place for us all to live in. Initially crime numbers will rise if everything’s reported, but this will reduce once the activities cease.

“Criminal activity in the village will continue to cause problems with the villagers with anti social behaviour, theft, crime, criminal activity. It will continue to hurt all of our pockets financially with house insurance and motor insurance growing under the criminal postcode lottery.”

The new Neighbourhood Watch scheme already has representatives in the following areas of the village: the Lower Heyford end of Heyford Road; The Crescent; Nizewell Head; Paines Hill; The Dickeridge (still to be confirmed); South Side/Jubilee Close; Water Lane; Shepherd’s Hill; Fenway; Grange Park; Cow Lane and Northside. Parish Clerk Cathy Fleet will liaise with the Parish Council.

Martin says that if your street or area has not already been covered and you would like to come forward to nominate yourself as a street coordinator then, please email your details to him at the address below.

He says becoming a street coordinator doesn’t involve too much, just informing your neighbours of events and developments in criminal-related activities and keeping an eye on one another and people who are vulnerable.

You can contact Martin at steepleastonneighbourhoodwatch@gmail.com

To find out more about Neighbourhood Watch in the village, how you can receive alerts and report crime, please click here.


NOTICE OF ELECTION

Election of Parish Councillors

for the Parishes listed below

  

Parish                                               Number of Parish Councillors to be elected

Banbury Town Council – Calthorpe South Ward                                       One

Barford St John and St Michael Parish Council                                       Seven

Bletchingdon Parish Council                                                                  Seven

Bloxham Parish Council                                                                         Twelve

Broughton Parish Council                                                                      Five

Charlton-on-Otmoor Parish Council                                                         Seven

Deddington Parish Council                                                                    Fourteen

Duns Tew Parish Council                                                                       Seven

Epwell Parish Council                                                                            Five

Fencott and Murcott Parish Council                                                        Five

Finmere Parish Council                                                                          Seven

Fringford Parish Council                                                                        Seven

Hethe Parish Council                                                                             Seven

Horley Parish Council                                                                            Seven

Hornton Parish Council                                                                          Seven

Horton-Cum-Studley Parish Council                                                        Five

Islip Parish Council                                                                                Seven

Kirtlington Parish Council                                                                       Seven

Merton Parish Council                                                                            Seven

Milcombe Parish Council                                                                       Seven

North Newington Parish Council                                                             Five

Shenington with Alkerton Parish Council                                                 Seven

Shipton-on-Cherwell and Thrupp Parish Council                                       Six

Shutford Parish Council                                                                           Seven

Sibford Ferris Parish Council                                                                 Five

Sibford Gower Parish Council                                                                Five

Steeple Aston Parish Council                                                                 Seven

Stratton Audley Parish Council                                                               Seven

Swalcliffe Parish Council                                                                       Seven

Tadmarton Parish Council                                                                      Six

Weston-on-the-Green Parish Council                                                       Eight

Wroxton Parish Council                                                                         Seven

 

  1. Nomination papers for Parish Elections may be obtained from Clerks to Parish Councils or the Returning Officer, Bodicote House, Bodicote, Banbury, Oxon, OX15 4AA.
  2. Nomination papers must be delivered to the Returning Officer, Bodicote House, Bodicote, Banbury, Oxon, OX15 4AA on any day after the date of this notice, Monday to Friday 10am to 4pm (excluding weekends and Bank Holidays) but no later than 4 pm on Friday, 6 April 2018.
  3. If any election is contested the poll will take place on Thursday, 3 May 2018.
  4. Applications, amendments or cancellations of postal votes must reach the Electoral Registration Officer at Bodicote House, Bodicote, Banbury, Oxon, OX15 4AA by 5 pm on Wednesday, 18 April 2018.
  5. New applications to vote by proxy at this election must reach the Electoral Registration Officer at Bodicote House, Bodicote, Banbury, Oxon, OX15 4AA by 5 pm on Wednesday, 25 April 2018.
  6. Applications to vote by proxy at this election applied for on grounds of either physical incapacity or in relation to occupation, employment or service occurring after 5 pm on Wednesday, 25 April 2018, must reach the Electoral Registration Officer at Bodicote House, Bodicote, Banbury, Oxon, OX15 4AA by 5 pm on Thursday, 3 May 2018.

Dated Tuesday 27 March 2018

Yvonne Rees

Returning Officer

Printed and published by the Returning Officer, Bodicote House, Bodicote, Banbury, Oxon, OX15 4AA


Congratulations to Steeple Aston WI as it celebrates its centenary

To read an account of the celebrations on 13th March and see lots of wonderful pictures, please click here

Steeple Aston Women’s Institute, the oldest extant WI in Oxfordshire, is celebrating its centenary in style in March with a special programme of activities and speakers, including a surprise outing for members in June. Its centenary dinner took place on 13th March at the Village Hall.

The current WI President, Merrill Bayley looks back over the achievements of the last 100 years. She writes: “The earliest document we hold states that, towards the end of the great war in 1917, Mrs Vincent of Cedar Lodge Steeple Aston, called a meeting of the women in the village and told them of a new society called The Women’s’ Institute, which had just started in Anglesey North Wales 1915.

“Miss L G Worrell took the minutes of the first documented meeting held on March 21st1918 and she subsequently became the first President. As a result this event has become our official birthday date. The records of the Oxfordshire Federation of Women’s Institutes (OFWI) confirm this with a simple entry stating, “Steeple Aston WI – Formed in March 1918”, whilst OFWI themselves were not formed until 1919.

The Minutes & Memory Books
“The minutes have been diligently kept with just a few gaps during WWII, which is pretty good going! We have a large collection of Minutes and Memory Books. The latter are beautifully covered with embroidered work created by various members over many years. These Memory Books hold souvenirs and photographs taken at events and meetings with various snippets of descriptive notes beside them.  We are continuing to compile these books, one per year, and now have an Archive Sub-Committee who have combed through all the old Memory Books, re-hinging and re-binding as necessary using acid free paper to ensure preservation, for perhaps the next 100 years?

What has Steeple Aston WI done for our Village?
“Never mind what the Romans did for Britain, what did Steeple Aston WI do for our village? During WWII our WI organised the ladies of the village to make-do and mend and collect vegetables and fruit for pickling and preserving. In order to carry out this incentive the Ministry of Food allocated the WI the extra sugar required. Our WI also knitted scarves and socks for members of the armed forces overseas.

“Since the war our WI has continued to undertake various projects within the village. For example, presenting embroidered hassocks to the Church, arranging to have a map of the village erected beside the bus stop on South Side and donating funds towards the replacement of the ancient Sycamore in the churchyard. We support many events in the village such as, running a stall at the Village Show selling jams, pickles, cakes and bric-a-brac. We present our Silver Jubilee Cup and our Coronation Bowl for both the Spring and Autumn shows.  We have also arranged for the planting of a tree on South Side with an accompanying plaque to commemorate the millennium as well as lobbying for and part funding better lighting outside the Village Hall.

“Each year we join with other village organisations to lay a wreath on the War Memorial.

Currently
“We are 36 members strong, with four new members joining recently. Our members ages range from 40 – 90.   Our WI is run by a committee (pictured here) currently led by office holders, President: Merrill Bayley, Treasurer: Linda Needle, Secretary: Janice Kinory and Vice President: Mary Rushworth, ably assisted by Pauline Brock, Catherine Crook, Julie Hillier, Angie Allen and Priscilla Lange.

“Members have been contributing to our Centenary Fund for several years and for the past two years a sub-committee has steered the preparation and planning for 2018. A special programme of activities and speakers has been arranged for this milestone year, including a surprise outing for June. Invitations have been sent to our members and special guests for our centenary dinner celebration on 13th March 2018 at the Village Hall.

The Future
“The WI motto is ‘Inspiring Women’. To this end we strive to enlighten, educate and usually entertain our members, to make new friends and connections through the wider WI community.  In keeping with new technologies we are embracing new methods of communication including Facebook and our own page on the Steeple Aston website. We continue to encourage all of our members to reach their own potential through the Steeple Aston Women’s Institute.”

To read an account of the celebrations on 13th March and see lots of wonderful pictures, please click here


 

FEBRUARY

Southside planning application withdrawn

The application for planning permission to build six homes on South Side opposite the entrance to Hill House has been withdrawn, at least for the time being.

The developer, Rectory Homes, withdrew its application on 15th February. This followed a number of objections from local residents, the Parish Council, the Mid Cherwell Neighbourhood Plan Forum and the Highway Authority

In general, neither the Parish Council nor other commentators are hostile to some development on this site. But there are major objections to the scheme proposed. The Parish Council listed the three main ones:

  1. Housing mix: the proposal is for six houses of four bedrooms. There is however a clear need locally for a mix of house sizes, including some with smaller number of bedrooms…..
  2. Safe pedestrian access: walking into the village with no footpath – especially in darkness – is dangerous, and difficult to solve where the road narrows at the Red Lion.
  3. Safe vehicular access: the new road junction for the development will exacerbate an already dangerous stretch of road unless measures are taken to improve safety. Both speeding and limited visibility on the bend here have caused several near misses for traffic using the Hill House lane used by about 20 cars serving various dwellings.

It is possible that a revised plan may be submitted at a later stage. A message from Amy Atkins of Rectory Homes is published on the Cherwell District Council planning website. In it, she confirms the withdrawal of the current application and writes to the planning department “I look forward to working with you in the near future to overcome the concerns of the site.”


Police to examine CCTV footage after more anti-social behaviour

Further anti-social behaviour by teenagers in the village during February has led to numerous reports to the police – and they should be able to look at some more CCTV footage which may help to identify the culprits.

Several incidents involving up to five teenagers have taken place on Paines Hill, South Side and in The Dickredge. There have been damage to cars and break-ins to sheds and a conservatory. Villagers are urged to take photographs or videos if they witness any incidents and make them available to the police. You can report non-urgent incidents online or by phoning 101

Paris Clerk Cathy Fleet reports that on Monday, 30th January a group of youths were seen openly taking drugs in the presence of school children in the playground. Later in the afternoon, the basin was pulled off the toilet wall taking tiles off with it, and the brand new soap dispenser was also pulled off the wall.

The following day some youths targeted the village shop, stealing some items of little value. The police have been informed of both incidents and it is hoped they will be able to examine CCTV footage from the shop and be able to identify the culprits.

Cathy Fleet said that the damage to the toilet will cost money to fix, not to mention the time involved. She added, “I think it’s time these idiots and their parents were held to account.”

In discussions on the village Facebook page many villagers echoed her frustration, calling for the parents to take responsibility for their children’s behaviour. There were also calls for CCTV to be installed in the area around the Village Hall. There are cameras already at the school and the shop, but the Parish Council has been reluctant to install cameras around the play area in the past. Now villagers are being encourage to raised the issue at the next Parish council meeting on February 19th.

These latest incidents follow on from a spate of vandalism in the village before Christmas. There were a number of photos taken of the culprits and the police were said to have spoken to them. After a few quiet weeks the problems have started up again.

Villagers are encouraged to report anything suspicious they see to the police, and to get photographic evidence if possible. The more people who contact the police the better. If the non-emergency number 101 isn’t answered, then dial 999.


Charlotte co-opted to fill last council vacancy 

Charlotte Bartlett has agreed to be co-opted on to the Parish Council. So for the next three months the council will have its full complement of members at last. Then they will all have to resign and stand again (if they want to) in the election to be held on Thursday, May 3rd.

Charlotte, of Seven Springs House, stood for election to the council last December. She was beaten by Richard MacAndrew by 72 votes to 57. But at their January meeting councillors decided to ask her if she was willing to be co-opted to fill the remaining vacancy. 

Before the election Charlotte was interviewed by Julia Whybrew for Steeple Aston Life. She said: “I realise that much of what I love about this village is directly because of the time and effort that others put into keeping it the way it is, strangely, both just the way it has always been and yet also vibrant and moving forward.”

Charlotte lived here when she was a child and all her early memories are of this village.  She had close friends in Middle Aston and kept her contacts with the village by visiting them for many years. Her family moved away because of her father’s job; then when she married she lived in Holland, New Zealand and Syria.

She eventually returned to London with her husband Andy and their two sons Oliver and Hugh. Quite by chance she discovered that her childhood home was for sale.  “It seemed to be too good to be true!”  They bought the house in 2004 and moved in. Charlotte says “My big regret is that our two sons were too old for Dr Radcliffe’s School, as I know that has always been like a bedrock for the village.”

Andy commutes to London weekly, where he works in finance, but both boys are still based nearby in Oxford. Oliver is just completing his PhD after eight years at the university, and Hugh works for a church charity having studied for a Master’s at Oxford Brookes.

Julia said that Charlotte has a lot to contribute to the Parish Council. She has both the time and the inclination to help other people.  She has worked in a PR company and has plenty of experience working with others.  She has been involved with community projects, particularly in Syria where she worked with women’s groups in villages around Damascus, teaching sewing skills and supplying equipment enabling them to earn their own living.  She started and ran her own project to distribute basic food supplies to the most vulnerable families in the winter months. She has experience of fundraising and is very keen to take an active part in the community.


JANUARY

Villagers protest against proposed Enstone development

A group of villagers in West Oxfordshire have joined together to object to a proposed development next to nearby Enstone airfield. They are appealing for other local people and parish councils to oppose the application for planning permission by 10th January.

The “Move the Mullin” campaign has been formed to fight a proposal by the Great Tew Estate and American businessman and philanthropist Peter Mullin to build an automotive museum, corporate pavilion, Bentley showroom and 28 luxury residential homes on land adjacent to Enstone Airfield.

They argue that the location for a proposed development of this scale and form in a rural area is inappropriate and contrary to national planning policy.  It has numerous costs for local residents – not least significantly increasing the traffic on small country roads that are already in a poor state of repair.

They suggest that this museum could be built in a location with much better connectivity to the road network and public transport, such as Bicester Heritage or Silverstone.

The Move the Mullin campaign, which is supported by the Campaign to Protect Rural England, is an informal group of residents who live in Enstone, Church Enstone, Gagingwell, Sandford St Martin, Ledwell, Westcote Barton, Middle Barton, Little Tew, and The Wortons. They are appealing for others to join them in objecting to this development.

They write: “The most effective way to oppose this development is to make a public objection to planning application 17/03745/OUT on WODC’s planning portal.  Please forward this email to your friends and neighbours to encourage them to make an objection too. The timeline for making objections is 10th January 2018 (although objections may be heard after that date) – so please do not delay! The more substantive objections that are made, the better chance we have to stop this development

“We believe that if national planning policy is properly applied to this application, and West Oxfordshire District Council hears the communities’ voice, we can stop this type of inappropriate development.

“To contact us please email movethemullin@gmail.com.”


Follow Steeple’s Rose as she sails round the world

Steeple Aston resident Rose Todd has now reached Australia as a crew member on Qingdao, one of the boats competing in the Clipper Round the World Race 2017-18.

She started her adventure in Liverpool on 20th August 2017, and will be sailing a total of 40,000 nautical miles to circumnavigate the globe in eleven months.

Rose took up sailing after the death of her son Harry at the age of 18. He spent his last few months supported by Helen and Douglas House, the Oxford Hospice for children and young people, and Rose is raising money for them.

She sailed two legs of the 2013 – 14 Clipper Race from San Francisco to London. But this time she has signed up for the whole race around the world. She has been given one of the most important roles on the boat – she is the victualler, which as she explained before she set off is a major responsibility.

She wrote, “Being the victualler on a boat is right up there at the top of the ‘you-cannot-get-this wrong’ list when it comes to crew roles! Being the victualler means that I am responsible for organising everything to do with food; deciding what we need (ie writing the menu), buying the stuff, packing the stuff into bags to survive the journey, deciding where to store the stuff in hiding places on the boat, retrieving the stuff when it is needed for cooking and eating, making sure we have enough stuff, and buying more stuff and repeating the process before the start of each race.”

Since last August, Rose has had some exciting times reaching Capetown in October, then seeing many seabirds as well as whales and dolphins on her way through the Southern Ocean to Australia. Now she faces the next few months travelling to China, then across the Pacific Ocean and through the Panama Canal to New York. Finally she will sail home across the Atlantic Ocean to Liverpool.

You can follow Rose’s adventures on her blog at https://wavingnotdrowningwithclipper.wordpress.com/

And you can help her raise money for Helen and Douglas House at https://www.justgiving.com/fundraising/Rose-Todd9


Mid-Cherwell Neighbourhood Plan to be submitted in February

The Mid-Cherwell Neighbourhood Plan will be submitted to Cherwell District Council in February, three-and-a-half years after the idea was first conceived.

Following the Pre-Submission consultation which closed in October 2017, all the Plan documents have been amended to take account of the many comments that were submitted by local residents, various organisations and landowners and statutory consultees.

But there has been a delay while an environment report has been prepared. In his monthly report, John Coley explains:

“Just when we thought we were set to formally submit our Plan, there has been a delay. We had hoped that Cherwell District Council would help us to with a “Strategic Environment Assessment” (SEA), but it’s turned out to that we were too optimistic.  We have had to produce the required document ourselves.  Not only that, but the SEA “screening”, as it’s called, must be studied by several Agencies first, including the Environment Agency.  This will inevitably delay us by about a further month.

“The SEA is a EU Directive, which applies now and may, or may not, apply after 2019. The Objective is “to provide for a high level of protection of the environment and to contribute to the integration of environmental considerations into the preparation and adoption of plans and programmes with a view to promoting sustainable development”.

“In essence, we had to show in our “screening” that the policies of the Neighbourhood Plan will not adversely impact on the environment. Since much of the Plan is aimed to protecting our rural environment of Mid-Cherwell, we’re hoping that this will be accepted without more delay.

“We are seeking to create “non-coalescence zones” between communities so that housing creep cannot join up villages. This is critical where development at Heyford Park could, if not checked, approach Upper Heyford and Caulcott. We had a very close Forum vote on this topic, which delivered a larger zone than some wanted, but less than the separation which others had asked for. This is now one of the Plan’s key policies.

“Hopefully by next month I will be able to report that we have now entered the formal process leading to the examination of the MCNP and its referendum.”

Following the submission of the report to CDC there will be a further six-week consultation period. The district council will then appoint an external Examiner to consider all the documents. After the Examiner’s report is published any final amendments will have to be agreed before a referendum is called.


Highways Authority says South Side plans are unsafe for pedestrians

The Local Highways Authority, Oxfordshire County Council, has added its objection to those of the Parish Council and others to the plans for six houses to be built on South Side.

In comments on the scheme the Highways Authority states it objects to the granting of planning permission “due to the lack of existing provision for pedestrians on the route between the site and the village” and they “do not consider that a safe and suitable access to the site can be achieved for all people….”

Steeple Aston Parish Council has already objected to the planning application by Rectory Homes to build six four-bedroomed houses on South Side opposite the entrance to Hill House. There have also been objections from the Mid-Cherwell Neighbourhood Plan Forum and from a number of villagers.

In general, neither the Parish Council nor other commentators are hostile to some development on this site. But there are major objections to the scheme proposed. The Parish Council comments: “While we consider that appropriate housing development on this site could be acceptable in principle, the application scheme is not suitable for the following reasons:

  1. Housing mix: the proposal is for six houses of four bedrooms. There is however a clear need locally for a mix of house sizes, including some with smaller number of bedrooms….. of the six dwellings only 2 should be 4-bedroom, 3 should be 3-bedroom, and 1 should be 2-bedroom. Such a mix would offer more affordable homes to local people, which we regard as an essential component of an acceptable scheme on this site.
  2. Safe pedestrian access: walking into the village with no footpath – especially in darkness – is dangerous, and difficult to solve where the road narrows at the Red Lion. There is no recognition of this difficult problem in the application (despite discussion at the local meeting at which the applicants presented their proposals in November 2017) …
  3. Safe vehicular access: the new road junction for the development will exacerbate an already dangerous stretch of road unless measures are taken to improve safety. Both speeding and limited visibility on the bend here have caused several near misses for traffic using the Hill House lane used by about 20 cars serving various dwellings opposite the site. The “Access Appraisal” report presented by the applicant relies on data collected in a week of heavy snowfall which must have produced untypical speed and volume data. We request that the survey be repeated in order to present data that can be taken seriously…..

Mid Cherwell Neighbourhood Plan Forum objects to the lack of smaller more affordable houses, and is concerned about pedestrians, as are many of the individual commentators. Their submission says simply, “The application scheme will require pedestrians to walk in the road to access the rest of the village, which is unacceptable.”

Another concern from former vice-chairman of the Parish Council Richard Preston is the lack of car parking space. He writes, “There is insufficient on-site parking for the six sizeable properties if one considers the probability that at certain times during the year, many of these properties will have visitors arriving by motor car. The outcome of this scenario would be vehicles parked on the main highway creating significant danger to the users of the highway for access to and from the village.

To see the plans and make a comment go to Cherwell District Council’s planning portal https://www.publicaccess.cherwell.gov.uk/online-applications/ and entering the reference number 17/02414/F.  The expiry date for neighbours’ comments is 24th January, although no date for consideration of the application has yet been set. To see the Parish Council’s comments in full, as well as comments by others, including the Highways Authority, click on the Documents tab.

Rectory Homes is a privately-owned company founded in 1991 and based in Haddenham, Buckinghamshire. It specialises in building high quality homes, often in quite small numbers, in London and the South East. They have built 100 houses in the last year, and are responsible for developments in nearby Witney, Thame and Oxford. The company has an agreement with the South Side landowner that they will purchase the site if their planning application is approved.

To find out more about the company and see examples of its work go to its website, www.rectory.co.uk


Parish Council and others object to South Side plan

Steeple Aston Parish Council is objecting to the planning application by Rectory Homes to build six four-bedroomed houses on South Side opposite the entrance to Hill House. There have also been objections from the Mid-Cherwell Neighbourhood Plan Forum and from a number of villagers.

In general, neither the Parish Council nor other commentators are hostile to some development on this site. But there are major objections to the scheme proposed. The Parish Council comments: “While we consider that appropriate housing development on this site could be acceptable in principle, the application scheme is not suitable for the following reasons:

  1. Housing mix: the proposal is for six houses of four bedrooms. There is however a clear need locally for a mix of house sizes, including some with smaller number of bedrooms….. of the six dwellings only 2 should be 4-bedroom, 3 should be 3-bedroom, and 1 should be 2-bedroom. Such a mix would offer more affordable homes to local people, which we regard as an essential component of an acceptable scheme on this site.
  2. Safe pedestrian access: walking into the village with no footpath – especially in darkness – is dangerous, and difficult to solve where the road narrows at the Red Lion. There is no recognition of this difficult problem in the application (despite discussion at the local meeting at which the applicants presented their proposals in November 2017) …
  3. Safe vehicular access: the new road junction for the development will exacerbate an already dangerous stretch of road unless measures are taken to improve safety. Both speeding and limited visibility on the bend here have caused several near misses for traffic using the Hill House lane used by about 20 cars serving various dwellings opposite the site. The “Access Appraisal” report presented by the applicant relies on data collected in a week of heavy snowfall which must have produced untypical speed and volume data. We request that the survey be repeated in order to present data that can be taken seriously…..

Mid Cherwell Neighbourhood Plan Forum objects to the lack of smaller more affordable houses, and is concerned about pedestrians, as are many of the individual commentators. Their submission says simply, “The application scheme will require pedestrians to walk in the road to access the rest of the village, which is unacceptable.”

Another concern from former vice-chairman of the Parish Council Richard Preston is the lack of car parking space. He writes, “There is insufficient on-site parking for the six sizeable properties if one considers the probability that at certain times during the year, many of these properties will have visitors arriving by motor car. The outcome of this scenario would be vehicles parked on the main highway creating significant danger to the users of the highway for access to and from the village.

To see the plans and make a comment go to Cherwell District Council’s planning portal https://www.publicaccess.cherwell.gov.uk/online-applications/ and entering the reference number 17/02414/F.  The expiry date for neighbours’ comments is 24th January, although no date for consideration of the application has yet been set. To see the Parish Council’s comments in full, as well as comments by others, click on the Documents tab.

Rectory Homes is a privately-owned company founded in 1991 and based in Haddenham, Buckinghamshire. It specialises in building high quality homes, often in quite small numbers, in London and the South East. They have built 100 houses in the last year, and are responsible for developments in nearby Witney, Thame and Oxford. The company has an agreement with the South Side landowner that they will purchase the site if their planning application is approved.

To find out more about the company and see examples of its work go to its website, www.rectory.co.uk


Police request help to fight anti-social behaviour outbreak

Thames Valley Police have asked villagers to report any further examples of criminal damage and anti-social behaviour following several incidents over the last few weeks. The police are aware of recent problems and are patrolling the village, but evidence of time and place will help them catch those responsible.

PCSO Louise Beaumont contacted the Parish Clerk Cathy Fleet after the most recent incident on 29th December when there was evidence of drinking and drug use in the area around the Village Hall and Play Area in Fir Lane.

PCSO Beaumont wrote “I have been asked by PC Shaun Sullivan to make contact about the reports of ASB/Damage in Steeple Aston mainly in and around the Recreation ground. I’m one of the Rural PCSO’s and patrol the area during the evenings as much as possible.

“If there are offences of criminal damage and ASB please can they be reported via 101 so we can patrol more effectively as this will help with times/days etc. I’m aware that the incidents are being discussed on the village Facebook page which unfortunately we do not monitor. It would be great if residents could be encouraged to report any offences/incidents via 101.”

This recent trouble follows on from a number of incidents of vandalism and anti-social behaviour in the village over the Christmas period. There was damage to an elderly pensioner’s car in Northside on 13th December. More damage to cars were reported on Southside, and a van was broken into and a satnav and camera stolen.

Later in the month two teenagers in hoodies were photographed jumping on the roof of the bus shelter near Bradshaw Close. Another villager shared photographs of three youths shining torches into cars on Heyford Road, and then two trying car doors in the early hours of the morning a few days later.

Other villagers have reported seeing three teenagers in hoodies around the village late in the evening, and there have been reports of youths knocking on doors and running away, which some residents living on their own have found quite threatening.

These incidents over Christmas follow on from two robberies in the village earlier in the month. and concerns about trespassing at Dr Radcliffe’s School. Chair of the Governors, Lise Boote, wrote on the Steeple Aston Facebook page “The governors at Dr Radcliffe’s have been liaising with the police regarding trespassing on the school site . The police are aware of a group in Steeple Aston and have stated that they need the community to report any incidents. If anyone has any evidence they need to call it in on 101. These people may be part of the same group.”

To see more discussion on this go to the website’s Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/steepleastonvillage/. You will need to become a member of the closed group to see all the posts.


Planning application made for six South Side houses

There has been a planning application to build six four-bedroomed houses on South Side opposite the entrance to Hill House. The application comes from Rectory Homes, the developer who gave a presentation about their plans to parish councillors and members of the public back in November.

The Parish Council will consider the application at the next meeting, and individuals can see the plans and make their comments by going to Cherwell District Council’s planning portal https://www.publicaccess.cherwell.gov.uk/online-applications/ and entering the reference number 17/02414/F.  The expiry date for neighbours’ comments is 24th January, although no date for consideration of the application has yet been set.

The plans show six two storey houses with access off South Side including parking and garaging. At the November meeting, George Bethall, land manager at Rectory Homes, said the houses had been designed to be in keeping with the rest of the village using local materials such as Cotswold stone, red bricks and timber cladding. Each house would be different. Nearly all the trees on the site would be retained, and he hoped that the development would improve the look of the entrance to the village.

Parish councillors and members of the public at the meeting expressed concerns about traffic and road safety particularly for pedestrians. They were also worried about the number of parking spaces to be provided and about drainage capacity.

Rectory Homes commissioned Glanville Consultants to carry out an Access Appraisal, including a speed survey along South Side. Unfortunately the week they chose for the survey was 8th to 14th December when there was heavy snow in the village. So it may not have shown a typical traffic pattern in normal weather. The consultants’ report concluded that safe vehicular access can be provided, but didn’t consider the safety of pedestrians.

Individuals are already starting to make comments on the application on the district council’s website. The former vice-chairman of the parish council, Richard Preston says he supports a sensitive development on this site but has three concerns.

He writes:

  1. There is insufficient on-site parking for the six sizeable properties if one considers the probability that at certain times during the year, many of these properties will have visitors arriving by motor car. The outcome of this scenario would be vehicles parked on the main highway creating significant danger to the users of the highway for access to and from the village.
  2. The pedestrian access / egress point as shown on the proposed plan will place residents from this development onto a relatively busy highway with no protection from oncoming traffic. If the council care to look at a previous consideration for development of this site they will see that their concern was lack of a public footpath linking the village. It would be hoped that residents of the proposed development would like to communicate with the rest of the village by walking into the centre and all its facilities but it would be improper and dangerous to expect them to risk their lives and that of their children by walking on a busy and narrow part of the main access road into the village.
  3. With such a comparatively large site would it not be more appropriate to encourage some “affordable” housing in addition to that proposed? This might in turn provide some much needed housing for the young people of our community and possibly a chance for the more senior members of our community to ‘down-size’.

Rectory Homes is a privately-owned company founded in 1991 and based in Haddenham, Buckinghamshire. It specialises in building high quality homes, often in quite small numbers, in London and the South East. They have built 100 houses in the last year, and are responsible for developments in nearby Witney, Thame and Oxford. The company has an agreement with the South Side landowner that they will purchase the site if their planning application is approved.

To find out more about the company and see examples of its work go to its website, www.rectory.co.uk